Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Dodge Durango 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 5.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 236 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 20.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 71 HP less power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 34 NM less than Dodge Durango. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 6.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 16.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 6.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 945 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 640 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 532 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2482 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`903 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |