Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs BMW X5 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 19 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 37 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 9.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 13 cm longer than the BMW X5, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`685 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X5 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
BMW X5 has
| |