Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Jeep Cherokee 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 15 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi Pajero is 36 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 820 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
| |