Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 40 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, whereas torque is 78 NM more than Toyota 4-Runner. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 12.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.81 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm shorter than the Toyota 4-Runner, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1263 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2257 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
| |