Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Nissan Pathfinder 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 334 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 15 HP more power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 39 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 11.9 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 27 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1670 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
| |