Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 2 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.5 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.90 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1253 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
| |