Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 15 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 11.7 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 22 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 415 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1700 litres | 2047 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space (by 689 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 347 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`810 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |