Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 65 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 133 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 75 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 33 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 25 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 29 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 415 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1700 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`810 kg | 2`835 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`155 kg | 1`730 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 655 kg | 1`105 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 69 procentiem less than Mitsubishi L 200. Therefore, Mitsubishi L 200 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |