Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs BMW X5 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 66 HP less power than BMW X5, but torque is 73 NM more than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 13.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 16 cm longer than the BMW X5, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 415 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1700 litres | 1550 litres | |
| In 5-seat version BMW X5 has more luggage space (by 50 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 150 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`810 | 2`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X5 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
BMW X5 has
| |