Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs BMW X5 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 19 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 37 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.6 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 16 cm longer than the BMW X5, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 415 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1700 litres | 1550 litres | |
| In 5-seat version BMW X5 has more luggage space (by 50 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 150 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`810 | 2`685 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X5 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
BMW X5 has
| |