Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 52 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 13.1 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 29 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | 2047 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 257 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`427 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 240 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |