Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Subaru B9 Tribeca 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 10 HP less power than Subaru B9 Tribeca, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Subaru B9 Tribeca. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 11.6 | |
|
The Subaru B9 Tribeca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 4 cm longer than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
| |