Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 185 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 15 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 27 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular.
However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo XC90 2006 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 9 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 215 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 398 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 47 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC90, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |