Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 20 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 11.7 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 29 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 889 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 257 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |