Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Subaru B9 Tribeca 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 260 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 90 HP less power than Subaru B9 Tribeca, but torque is 23 NM more than Subaru B9 Tribeca. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 11.6 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 4 cm longer than the Subaru B9 Tribeca, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 235 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 20 litres less trunk space than the Subaru B9 Tribeca. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Subaru B9 Tribeca has
| |