Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Porsche Cayenne 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Porsche Cayenne is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 70 HP less power than Porsche Cayenne, whereas torque is 177 NM less than Porsche Cayenne. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 6.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
The Porsche Cayenne is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 480 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Cayenne. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Porsche Cayenne gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.71 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm longer than the Porsche Cayenne, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 670 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | 1780 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 455 litres less trunk space than the Porsche Cayenne. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 10 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.5 metres less than that of the Porsche Cayenne, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 21 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Porsche Cayenne has
| |