Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Hyundai Santa FE 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Hyundai Santa FE) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 189 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 248 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Santa FE is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 19 HP less power than Hyundai Santa FE, but torque is 125 NM more than Hyundai Santa FE. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 10.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.72 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 22 cm longer than the Hyundai Santa FE, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 969 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | 1582 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 754 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Santa FE. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 208 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.5 metres more than that of the Hyundai Santa FE, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Santa FE has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Hyundai Santa FE has
| |