Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Dodge Journey 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Dodge Journey) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 3 HP less power than Dodge Journey, but torque is 148 NM more than Dodge Journey. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 77 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 1 cm longer than the Dodge Journey, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`381 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 200 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
| |