Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs BMW X6 2008
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 286 HP | |
Torque: | 373 NM | 580 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
BMW X6 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 116 HP less power than BMW X6, whereas torque is 207 NM less than BMW X6. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 7.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 8.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 345 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 85 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
750 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
BMW X6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
BMW X6 2008 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering strong performance, the ... More about BMW X6 2008 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.90 m | 4.88 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.98 m | |
Height: | 1.87 m | 1.69 m | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is 2 cm longer than the BMW X6, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 18 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 570 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | 1450 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 355 litres less trunk space than the BMW X6. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 340 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 1.4 metres less than that of the BMW X6, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`710 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 11 600 | 13 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
BMW X6 has
| |