Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs BMW X5 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 520 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 65 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 147 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 5.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1230 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.77 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm longer than the BMW X5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | 1750 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 405 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 40 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 1.6 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X5 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
BMW X5 has
| |