Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 261 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 15 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 82 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 10.4 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`810 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |