Mitsubishi Pajero 2011 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Pajero is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Jeep Grand Cherokee has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.8 (petrol) | 2.7 - 4.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 140 - 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 295 - 425 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 8.3 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 9.7 - 16.5 | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 29 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 663 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 441 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`910 | ~ 2`447 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |