Mitsubishi Pajero 2011 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Pajero is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Toyota Land Cruiser has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.8 (petrol) | 3.0 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 163 - 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 343 - 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.5 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 9.0 - 13.6 | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 663 litres | 620 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Pajero has 43 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`910 | ~ 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |