Mitsubishi Pajero 2011 vs Toyota Highlander 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Highlander can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota Highlander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 3.8 | 2.7 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 250 HP | 188 - 280 HP | |
Torque: | 329 NM | 252 - 337 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 7.3 - 10.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 8.4 - 10.6 | |
Mitsubishi Pajero petrol engines consumes on average 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Highlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.90 m | 4.87 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.93 m | |
Height: | 1.87 m | 1.73 m | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is 4 cm longer than the Toyota Highlander, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 14 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 663 litres | 391 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2370 litres | |
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Pajero has 272 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Highlander. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 5.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`910 | ~ 2`741 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | 21 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota Highlander has
| |