Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Honda CR-V 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Mitsubishi Pajero is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 202 HP | 128 - 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 373 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 17.8 seconds | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 14.2 | 9.7 - 10.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero petrol engines consumes on average 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 25 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 12 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 670 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`800 | ~ 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |