Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 | 2.7 - 3.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 202 HP | 125 - 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 373 NM | 240 - 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 17.8 seconds | 10.7 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 14.2 | 9.5 - 14.1 | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. On average, Mitsubishi Pajero equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 36 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 13 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1150 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`800 | ~ 2`663 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |