Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 | 3.2 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 202 HP | 165 - 202 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 450 NM | 318 - 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 - 17.1 seconds | 10 - 13.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 13.8 | 9.1 - 13.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero 2003. On average, Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero 2003. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 is smaller. Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 is 41 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero 2003, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 415 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1700 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero 2003, which means Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`800 | ~ 2`670 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |