Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Hyundai Terracan 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.5 | 2.9 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 202 HP | 163 - 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 450 NM | 294 - 345 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 - 17.1 seconds | 10.7 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 13.8 | 8.7 - 15.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Hyundai Terracan. On average, Mitsubishi Pajero equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 40 cm shorter than the Hyundai Terracan, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1955 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 1.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Terracan, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`800 | ~ 2`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Hyundai Terracan has
| |