Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Pajero is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Jeep Grand Cherokee is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi Pajero also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.8 | 3.0 - 6.1 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 247 HP | 201 - 425 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 381 NM | 307 - 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 17.1 seconds | 5 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 13.4 | 10.2 - 16.4 | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Mitsubishi Pajero equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.74 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 38 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Pajero has 563 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.6 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`694 | ~ 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |