Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Volkswagen Touareg 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen Touareg can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mitsubishi Pajero also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.5 - 3.8 | 2.5 - 6.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 247 HP | 174 - 450 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 381 NM | 360 - 750 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 17.1 seconds | 5.9 - 12 seconds | |
| In general, Volkswagen Touareg are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mitsubishi Pajero. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 13.4 | 8.3 - 16.4 | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Touareg. On average, Mitsubishi Pajero equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touareg. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Pajero is 38 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Touareg, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1790 litres | 1570 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has 135 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touareg. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 220 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Touareg, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`694 kg | ~ 2`979 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`218 kg | ~ 2`354 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 476 kg | ~ 625 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 31 procentiem less than Volkswagen Touareg. Therefore, Volkswagen Touareg is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Volkswagen Touareg has
| |