Mitsubishi Pajero 1991 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mitsubishi Pajero
1991 - 1997
Jeep Grand Cherokee
1998 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mitsubishi Pajero is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 2.4 - 3.52.7 - 4.7

Performance

Power: 99 - 245 HP140 - 258 HP
Torque: 211 - 343 NM295 - 425 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 - 25.1 seconds8.3 - 14 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.0 - 14.59.7 - 16.5
Mitsubishi Pajero petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Mitsubishi Pajero equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.61 m
Width: 1.75 m1.85 m
Height: 1.88 m1.79 m
Mitsubishi Pajero is 10 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 1350 litres1104 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2600 litres2047 litres
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage capacity.
Mitsubishi Pajero has 246 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 553 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.1 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 3`073~ 2`447
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

below average
Average price (€): 36003400
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv