Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.2 - 3.5 | 2.8 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 - 202 HP | 125 - 208 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 - 373 NM | 292 - 313 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 13.8 seconds | 11.3 - 19.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 14.2 | 12.4 - 14.3 | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero 1997. On average, Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 equipped with diesel engines consume 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero 1997. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 is 9 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Pajero 1997, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero 1997, which means Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`300 | ~ 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |