Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mitsubishi Pajero
2000 - 2003
Jeep Grand Cherokee
1998 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mitsubishi Pajero is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 3.2 - 3.52.7 - 4.7

Performance

Power: 165 - 202 HP140 - 258 HP
Torque: 318 - 373 NM295 - 425 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 - 13.8 seconds8.3 - 14 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.5 - 14.29.7 - 16.5
Mitsubishi Pajero petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Mitsubishi Pajero equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.61 m
Width: 1.88 m1.85 m
Height: 1.86 m1.79 m
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger.
Mitsubishi Pajero is 19 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data1104 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2047 litres
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 3`300~ 2`447
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

below average
Average price (€): 30003400
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
  • also available in 2WD
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv