Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Jeep Cherokee 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.2 - 3.5 | 2.4 - 3.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 - 202 HP | 143 - 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 - 373 NM | 224 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 13.8 seconds | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 14.2 | 9.0 - 14.6 | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Cherokee. On average, Mitsubishi Pajero equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi Pajero is 36 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 909 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1951 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`300 | ~ 2`368 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |