Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.2 - 3.5 | 3.0 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 - 202 HP | 125 - 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 - 373 NM | 295 - 434 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 13.8 seconds | 10.7 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 14.2 | 9.5 - 16.6 | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. On average, Mitsubishi Pajero equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi Pajero is 2 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 8 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`300 | ~ 3`033 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
| |