Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Grand Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Grand Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.2 - 3.5 | 2.7 - 4.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 - 202 HP | 140 - 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 - 373 NM | 295 - 425 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 13.8 seconds | 8.3 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 13.8 | 9.7 - 16.5 | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Jeep Grand Cherokee. On average, Mitsubishi Pajero equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.79 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1700 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 689 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 347 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`670 | ~ 2`447 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |