Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.2 - 3.5 | 3.0 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 - 202 HP | 163 - 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 - 373 NM | 343 - 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 13.8 seconds | 9.5 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 13.8 | 9.0 - 13.6 | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. On average, Mitsubishi Pajero equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.90 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 13 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1700 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Pajero has 205 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`670 | ~ 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |