Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.2 - 3.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.5 - 3.0 (diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 - 202 HP | 190 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 - 373 NM | 450 - 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 - 13.8 seconds | 8.9 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 - 13.8 | 8.7 - 9.5 | |
|
On average, Mitsubishi Pajero equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.78 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 9 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 515 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1700 litres | 2091 litres | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Pajero has 100 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 391 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.5 metres less than that of the Nissan Pathfinder, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`670 | ~ 2`913 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |