Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 3.8 | 3.0 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 - 250 HP | 163 - 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 261 - 441 NM | 343 - 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 - 14 seconds | 9.5 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 - 13.5 | 9.0 - 13.6 | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. On average, Mitsubishi Pajero equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Land Cruiser, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 620 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 405 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`024 | ~ 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |