Mitsubishi Galant 2000 vs Mazda 626 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 142 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Galant engine produces 27 HP more power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Mazda 626. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.7 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Galant is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Galant consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Galant over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 470'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 40 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Pajero, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Galant might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Galant engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.68 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.52 m | |
| Mitsubishi Galant and Mazda 626 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | 1677 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Galant has 120 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 626 (by 277 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Galant has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 626 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Galant, so Mitsubishi Galant quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.8/10 | 6.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Galant has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |