Mitsubishi Galant 2000 vs BMW 3 series 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Galant engine produces 14 HP less power than BMW 3 series, but torque is 1 NM more than BMW 3 series. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Galant reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 10.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Galant is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Galant consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Galant over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Galant gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
| Mitsubishi Galant is 16 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Galant has 30 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Galant is 0.8 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Mitsubishi Galant can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Galant has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Galant, so Mitsubishi Galant quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.8/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Galant has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |