Mitsubishi Galant 1997 vs Ford Mondeo 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 158 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Galant engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Galant reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Galant consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Galant could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Galant consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Galant is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Galant is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | 1610 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Galant has 120 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 210 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Galant is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means Mitsubishi Galant can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`950 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Galant has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Mondeo, so Mitsubishi Galant quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.8/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Galant has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |