Mitsubishi Galant 1997 vs Audi A6 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Galant engine produces 14 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 47 NM less than Audi A6. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Galant reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Galant is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Galant consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Galant over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Galant consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant is smaller. Mitsubishi Galant is 17 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Galant is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Galant has 30 litres more trunk space than the Audi A6. The Audi A6 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Galant is 0.6 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Mitsubishi Galant can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Galant has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A6 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Galant, so Mitsubishi Galant quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.8/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Galant has
|
Audi A6 has
| |