Mitsubishi Galant 1997 vs Mazda 626 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mazda 626 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Galant engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 28 NM less than Mazda 626. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Galant reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.3 | |
|
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Galant consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Galant could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda 626 1999 2.0 engine: The engine is reliable if you use quality diesel. Turbine life is not very long, however. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.52 m | |
| Mitsubishi Galant is 5 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Galant is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | 1677 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Galant has 65 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 626 (by 277 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`935 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Galant has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 626 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Galant, so Mitsubishi Galant quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.8/10 | 6.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Galant has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |