Mitsubishi Galant 1997 vs Volvo S60 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Galant engine produces 114 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 152 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Galant reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Galant is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Galant consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Galant over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Galant consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Mitsubishi Galant is 5 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Galant is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 424 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | 1034 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Galant has 46 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Galant (by 366 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Galant is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Mitsubishi Galant can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Galant has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S60 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Galant, so Mitsubishi Galant quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.8/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Galant has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |