Mitsubishi Galant 1997 vs Opel Omega 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Galant and Opel Omega have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Galant torque is 7 NM less than Opel Omega. Mitsubishi Galant reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mitsubishi Galant) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Opel Omega) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 45 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Vectra, Opel Calibra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Galant might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant is smaller. Mitsubishi Galant is 16 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Galant is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | 830 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Galant has 60 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Galant (by 570 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Galant is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Omega. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Galant has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Galant, so Mitsubishi Galant quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Galant has
|
Opel Omega has
| |