Mitsubishi Galant 1997 vs Audi A6 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 101 HP | |
Torque: | 178 NM | 157 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Galant is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Galant engine produces 35 HP more power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Galant reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.3 | |
Mitsubishi Galant consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Galant could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Galant engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 45 years | 6 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Used also on Audi 100 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Galant might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
Mitsubishi Galant is smaller. Mitsubishi Galant is 17 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Galant is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 510 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | no data | |
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Galant has 40 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Galant is 0.6 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Mitsubishi Galant can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`895 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | average | |
Mitsubishi Galant has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A6 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Galant, so Mitsubishi Galant quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 5.8/10 | 8.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Galant has
|
Audi A6 has
| |