Mitsubishi Galant 1997 vs Mazda 3 2009

 
Mitsubishi Galant
1997 - 2004
Mazda 3
2009 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 136 HP150 HP
Torque: 178 NM187 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds9.1 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi Galant engine produces 14 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Galant reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.57.4
Real fuel consumption: 9.3 l/100km8.4 l/100km
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi Galant consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Galant could require 165 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Galant consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
960 km on highway960 km on highway
680 km with real consumption650 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 520'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Galant engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 46 years13 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space WagonInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Galant might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mitsubishi Galant engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Mazda 3 2009 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.58 m
Width: 1.74 m1.76 m
Height: 1.42 m1.47 m
Mitsubishi Galant is 5 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Galant is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 470 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1400 litresno data
Mitsubishi Galant has more luggage capacity.
Mitsubishi Galant has 40 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Galant is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mitsubishi Galant can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8501`790
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 20003200
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Galant has
  • timing belt engine
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv