Mitsubishi Galant 1997 vs Mazda 626 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 163 HP | 100 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 - 225 NM | 152 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 - 12.8 seconds | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 10.1 | 6.3 - 9.1 | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, Mitsubishi Galant equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.52 m | |
| Mitsubishi Galant is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 626, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Galant is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | 1677 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Galant has 120 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 626 (by 277 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`866 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.8/10 | 6.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 626 has
| |