Mitsubishi Galant 2004 vs Volvo S80 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi Galant is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo S80 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Galant is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo S80 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 (petrol) | 1.6 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 - 258 HP | 109 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 213 - 330 NM | 185 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 6.9 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 10.3 | 4.9 - 11.3 | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S80. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
| Mitsubishi Galant is 1 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Galant is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Galant is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo S80, which means Mitsubishi Galant can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`985 | ~ 2`168 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Galant has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |